From transformers and switchgear to ring main units, substations, circuit breakers and smart components, Jubang provides integrated product support for power distribution projects.

Discover Jubang’s strengths in technology R&D, quality testing and smart manufacturing, supporting reliable electrical equipment and efficient power distribution solutions for global customers.

From technical consultation and OEM/ODM customization to EPC support, smart O&M, delivery documentation and after-sales service, Jubang supports your project at every stage.

Explore Jubang Group’s development history, intelligent manufacturing base, R&D platforms, CNAS-accredited laboratory and global project service capabilities.

Before a prefabricated-substation RFQ is issued, the project team should identify one current source for every drawing and record who may change or approve it. A controlled register prevents an old one-line diagram, civil sketch, or supplier markup from being treated as a silent instruction.
This is a document-control guide, not a drawing package or an engineering approval. It does not set dimensions, cable routes, equipment ratings, safety arrangements, or construction instructions.

A project may call many files “the drawing”: a one-line, a general arrangement, a civil-interface sketch, a supplier outline, or a marked PDF. Begin by naming the file type, revision, source, date, and intended decision. A file without those fields is reference material, not a controlled instruction.
IEC 62271-202 is useful scope context for AC prefabricated substations. It does not issue a project drawing or approve a configuration.
Important: Do not use an untracked markup as an RFQ instruction. Put its source, revision, owner, and acceptance route in the register before relying on it. (IEC 62271-202)
Use one register rather than separate email chains. It should link each record to its source and decision purpose, while allowing the project team to show what is still missing.
| Record | Register fields | Typical owner |
|---|---|---|
| One-line diagram | Revision, source, status, decision use | EPC / design authority |
| Civil interface drawing | Revision, interface owner, open actions | EPC / civil designer |
| Supplier document | Quotation revision, deviation reference, response owner | Supplier / EPC |
| Owner requirement | Contract source, approval route, status | Owner / project manager |
The register does not turn an early document into a final design. It shows which party must provide the next controlled input.
The party that supplies a drawing is not automatically the party that accepts a change. Make both roles explicit. A supplier may issue a marked document, an EPC may coordinate interfaces, and an owner or design authority may accept a revision under the project process.

| Role | Record in the register | Avoid assuming |
|---|---|---|
| Document owner | Who issues the current revision | That the owner accepts all changes |
| Technical reviewer | What question is being reviewed | That a comment is approval |
| Approval authority | Who can close a revision | That a quotation confirms compliance |
| Coordinator | Who maintains the action log | That coordination replaces engineering review |
For the electrical-content review of a one-line, see the related prefabricated substation single-line diagram article. This article controls revision ownership rather than interpreting the electrical design.
Every markup should reference the controlled file it comments on. Give it a date, issuing party, question, affected interface, and an acceptance path. Keep a supplier’s clarification separate from a project-approved change.
Useful questions include:
This method makes the record traceable without deciding whether a specific technical proposal is suitable.
Before a review meeting or RFQ release, freeze a document list for that purpose. The package should show the issue date, the documents included, excluded items, unresolved actions, and the person responsible for the next update.
| Package check | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Named purpose | Keeps the review from expanding into an undefined design approval |
| Revision list | Makes the current source visible |
| Open-action log | Preserves missing inputs and decisions |
| Distribution list | Shows who received the same record set |
| Acceptance route | Distinguishes comment, coordination, and approval |
Do not treat a frozen RFQ package as a construction release or an acceptance record.
Ask bidders to use the controlled register and identify any missing input or deviation. A concise RFQ table can prevent suppliers from filling gaps with unrelated catalogue assumptions.
| RFQ input | Buyer should provide | Why it is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Controlled drawing list | File type, revision, date and source | Establishes the document basis |
| Interface records | Current one-line and civil-interface references | Identifies scope boundaries |
| Markup and action log | Open questions, owner and acceptance route | Keeps deviations visible |
| Required deliverables | Requested drawings, comments and document format | Aligns the response package |
| Commercial scope | Terms, exclusions and quotation revision | Separates offer scope from approval |
The project authority must confirm all technical choices and project requirements outside this record-control process.
After the project controls its drawing register, it can review the JUBANG prefabricated substation range as an equipment-family starting point.

The page cannot replace project drawings, approve a revision, establish equipment fit, or demonstrate compliance. Use JUBANG Contact Us to submit the register and identify the project documents available for review.
No. It is a practical register structure. The contract, project procedures, and responsible approval authority determine the actual approval process.
List every document used to define the RFQ or review boundary, including the current one-line, civil interfaces, supplier documents, owner requirements, and open actions.
The project should name the approval authority in its own process. A document owner or reviewer may not have authority to accept the change.
Link each markup to the controlled revision, issuing party, question, affected interface, response owner, and acceptance route.
Each item has a source, revision, date, status, owner, intended use, and a clear route for resolving superseded or open items.
Attach the controlled drawing list, relevant interfaces, open-action log, requested deliverables, and the commercial scope statement.
No. A product page can introduce a range but cannot define project interfaces, approve a revision, or confirm a configuration.