From transformers and switchgear to ring main units, substations, circuit breakers and smart components, Jubang provides integrated product support for power distribution projects.

Discover Jubang’s strengths in technology R&D, quality testing and smart manufacturing, supporting reliable electrical equipment and efficient power distribution solutions for global customers.

From technical consultation and OEM/ODM customization to EPC support, smart O&M, delivery documentation and after-sales service, Jubang supports your project at every stage.

Explore Jubang Group’s development history, intelligent manufacturing base, R&D platforms, CNAS-accredited laboratory and global project service capabilities.

Before witnessing a renewable booster substation FAT, the EPC should align the equipment identity, approved drawings, test procedure, inspection and test plan, witness points, calibration records, signatories, and deviation workflow in one controlled index. This article is a document-readiness guide, not a test result or acceptance decision.

“FAT” can cover a transformer, MV switchgear, protection and control interfaces, or the complete prefabricated-station scope. Start by naming the equipment boundary and the document revision under review. Do not infer a test scope from a product photograph or a generic product-family page.
Important: A witness invitation is not evidence that a test procedure, approved drawing set, calibration record, and deviation route are complete. Keep those records in the controlled index before the witness date. (IEC 62271-202)
The document index should allow every report page to be traced to the equipment being witnessed. Record the asset or serial identity, scope boundary, drawing number and revision, procedure revision, and the party controlling each record.
| Identity field | Review input | Owner to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment identity | Nameplate or approved asset record | Supplier / EPC |
| Scope boundary | Transformer, MV, enclosure and interface matrix | EPC |
| Drawing revision | Approved GA, schematic and wiring references | Design authority |
| Procedure revision | FAT procedure and change history | Supplier |
The inspection and test plan should point to the procedure section, expected record, and witness or hold point. That mapping keeps the witness conversation on documented scope rather than on an improvised checklist.

| Record | What to check before witnessing | Do not claim |
|---|---|---|
| FAT procedure | Revision, sequence, prerequisites and sign-off fields | A passing result |
| ITP | Test/inspection reference and witness status | A completed hold point |
| Calibration record | Instrument identity, validity and traceability | Measurement accuracy beyond the record |
| Drawing set | Applicable scope and revision | Final as-built acceptance |
For broader project inputs, see JUBANG’s PV booster station design inputs. That article is not a FAT result or commissioning method.
List who prepares the record, who witnesses, who reviews technical evidence, and who accepts a deviation. The owner, EPC, supplier, and independent witness can have different responsibilities; a signature block should not silently transfer them.
The handoff should identify:
JUBANG’s BESS booster substation protection interfaces is a related interface topic, not evidence of a FAT configuration.
Record each deviation with a unique reference, affected document, factual observation, owner, due date, and disposition route. Keep “open,” “under review,” and “closed” distinct. A signed attendance sheet does not close an engineering deviation.
| Deviation field | Minimum record |
|---|---|
| Reference | Unique action or NCR number |
| Evidence | Report page, drawing or observation reference |
| Responsibility | Named owner and reviewer |
| Disposition | Approved route, revision, and due date |
| Closure evidence | Updated record or acceptance note |
This process records project decisions; it does not create a pass/fail conclusion or certify the equipment.
Send one controlled revision register with the quotation or FAT request. Ask the supplier to identify missing inputs and deviations rather than silently applying defaults.
| FAT/RFQ input | Buyer should provide | Why it is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Scope basis | One-line diagram, scope matrix and revision | Defines what is witnessed |
| Identity records | Asset/serial list and nameplate references | Links records to equipment |
| Procedure basis | Approved FAT procedure and ITP | Defines witness points |
| Drawing set | GA, schematic and interface drawings | Supports traceability |
| Quality records | Calibration and document-control requirements | Makes evidence reviewable |
| Action control | Deviation log template and approval path | Prevents silent closure |
Once the scope matrix, document index, and open-action process are approved, the EPC can discuss the project with the JUBANG prefabricated substation range.

The public product page does not prove a FAT procedure, test value, certification, compliance, or acceptance. Send the controlled pack through JUBANG Contact Us for project-specific review.
Use a controlled index containing the approved scope, drawings, FAT procedure, ITP, witness points, calibration records, signatories, and deviation route.
The approved project procedure defines the checks. This article explains how to review that procedure and its records; it does not publish test values or results.
The project should name the preparer, supplier reviewer, owner/EPC witness, and approval authority in the document-control plan.
Give it a unique reference, record objective evidence, assign an owner, and route the disposition through the approved project change or quality process.
No. Attendance records show participation; closure requires the documented disposition and the responsible approval evidence.
Yes. Provide the scope, identity, procedure, ITP, drawings, quality-record requirements, and action-control template so the supplier can identify gaps before witnessing.